Nellis AFB is Las Vegas has one of these buildings built. ask to see plans. was a piping nightmare.Cannot share much more than that Tom Noble American Fire Sprinkler Assn. Technical Programs Specialists http://www.firesprinkler.org
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 8:59 AM, TIM STONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > US Air force project. F35 fight simulators, 4 of them inside one building. > > > > Regards, > > G. Tim Stone > > G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC > > 117 Old Stage Rd. > > Essex Junction, VT. 05452 > > Cell: (802) 373-0638 > > [email protected] > >> On September 20, 2017 at 9:29 AM Matt Grise <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What is in the simulators? Could there be a shielded fire in there? >> >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Prahl, Craig/GVL >> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:27 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Flight Simulator Bldg >> >> >> Are these servo motor articulated or use hydraulic fluids? >> >> >> If there are no hydraulic fluids or other contributing hazards, the building >> may be able to classified as an F-2 occupancy and no sprinklers required. >> >> >> You might also investigate the possibility of a water mist or hybrid water >> mist system in lieu of sprinklers for such an occupancy but that will take >> some analysis and engineering work to determine suitability or viability of >> the option. >> >> >> >> Craig L. Prahl >> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME >> CH2M >> 200 Verdae Blvd. >> Greenville, SC 29607 >> Direct - 864.920.7540 >> >> Fax - 864.920.7129 >> >> CH2MHILL Extension 77540 >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of TIM >> STONE >> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 9:23 AM >> To: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> Subject: Fwd: Flight Simulator Bldg [EXTERNAL] >> >> >> What occupancy should be considered? >> >> Steel building, 25' high with Flight Simulators inside. Engineer has asked >> that no sprinklers be installed directly over simulators which are about 22' >> in diameter. I need to use extended coverage. Occupancy not specified. I am >> leaning toward Ordinary Hazard 1 as minimum. >> >> Am I on the right track or could I consider Light Hazard? >> >> Cheers, >> >> G. Tim Stone >> >> G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC >> >> 117 Old Stage Rd. >> >> Essex Junction, VT. 05452 >> >> Cell: (802) 373-0638 >> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
