Don’t know if this will help, but FM Data Sheet 7-3 is for flight simulators.
Mike Stossel SET [400dpiLogoCropped] 36 Barren Road East Stroudsburg, PA 18302 Office: 973-670-2627 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 10:11 AM To: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Flight Simulator Bldg I'm sure there will be a lot of electronics inside. Since you have a pilot in an enclosed space, are there any systems inside for life safety? Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT 860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-553-3553 (fax) 860-608-4559 (cell) On Sep 20, 2017 at 10:06 AM, <Tim Stone<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Matt, Todd, I have no info on the simulators. I am assuming no combustible construction with a pilot inside. I do agree with E H Grp 2. Not sure that really applies in this case. While pilot training is going on there is also a manned computer room over seeing the simulator. Regards, G. Tim Stone G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC 117 Old Stage Rd. Essex Junction, VT. 05452 Cell: (802) 373-0638 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> On September 20, 2017 at 9:29 AM Matt Grise <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: What is in the simulators? Could there be a shielded fire in there? Matt From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Prahl, Craig/GVL Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:27 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: Flight Simulator Bldg Are these servo motor articulated or use hydraulic fluids? If there are no hydraulic fluids or other contributing hazards, the building may be able to classified as an F-2 occupancy and no sprinklers required. You might also investigate the possibility of a water mist or hybrid water mist system in lieu of sprinklers for such an occupancy but that will take some analysis and engineering work to determine suitability or viability of the option. Craig L. Prahl Fire Protection Group Lead/SME CH2M 200 Verdae Blvd. Greenville, SC 29607 Direct - 864.920.7540 Fax - 864.920.7129 CH2MHILL Extension 77540 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of TIM STONE Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 9:23 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Flight Simulator Bldg [EXTERNAL] What occupancy should be considered? Steel building, 25' high with Flight Simulators inside. Engineer has asked that no sprinklers be installed directly over simulators which are about 22' in diameter. I need to use extended coverage. Occupancy not specified. I am leaning toward Ordinary Hazard 1 as minimum. Am I on the right track or could I consider Light Hazard? Cheers, G. Tim Stone G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC 117 Old Stage Rd. Essex Junction, VT. 05452 Cell: (802) 373-0638 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
