Tim,
I assume the simulator would or might have pressurized
hydraulic lines to move the cabin. This would keep you in Ordinary Hazard for
design.
Dick
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of TIM STONE
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 9:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: Flight Simulator Bldg
What occupancy should be considered?
Steel building, 25' high with Flight Simulators inside. Engineer has asked that
no sprinklers be installed directly over simulators which are about 22' in
diameter. I need to use extended coverage. Occupancy not specified. I am
leaning toward Ordinary Hazard 1 as minimum.
Am I on the right track or could I consider Light Hazard?
Cheers,
G. Tim Stone
G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
117 Old Stage Rd.
Essex Junction, VT. 05452
Cell: (802) 373-0638
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
