I'm sure there will be a lot of electronics inside. Since you have a pilot in an enclosed space, are there any systems inside for life safety? Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT 860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-553-3553 (fax) 860-608-4559 (cell)
> > On Sep 20, 2017 at 10:06 AM, <Tim Stone (mailto:[email protected])> > wrote: > > > > > Matt, Todd, > > > > I have no info on the simulators. I am assuming no combustible construction > with a pilot inside. > > > > > > > > > I do agree with E H Grp 2. Not sure that really applies in this case. While > pilot training is going on there is also a manned computer room over seeing > the simulator. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > G. Tim Stone > > > > G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC > > > > 117 Old Stage Rd. > > > > Essex Junction, VT. 05452 > > > > Cell: (802) 373-0638 > > > > [email protected] > > > > > On September 20, 2017 at 9:29 AM Matt Grise <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > What is in the simulators? Could there be a shielded fire in there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sprinklerforum > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Prahl, Craig/GVL > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:27 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: Flight Simulator Bldg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are these servo motor articulated or use hydraulic fluids? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If there are no hydraulic fluids or other contributing hazards, the > > building may be able to classified as an F-2 occupancy and no sprinklers > > required. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You might also investigate the possibility of a water mist or hybrid water > > mist system in lieu of sprinklers for such an occupancy but that will take > > some analysis and engineering work to determine suitability or viability of > > the option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Craig L. Prahl > > Fire Protection Group Lead/SME > > CH2M > > 200 Verdae Blvd. > > Greenville, SC 29607 > > Direct - 864.920.7540 > > > > > > > > Fax - 864.920.7129 > > > > > > > > CH2MHILL Extension 77540 > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sprinklerforum > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of TIM > > STONE > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 9:23 AM > > To: [email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected]) > > Subject: Fwd: Flight Simulator Bldg [EXTERNAL] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What occupancy should be considered? > > > > > > > > Steel building, 25' high with Flight Simulators inside. Engineer has asked > > that no sprinklers be installed directly over simulators which are about > > 22' in diameter. I need to use extended coverage. Occupancy not specified. > > I am leaning toward Ordinary Hazard 1 as minimum. > > > > > > > > Am I on the right track or could I consider Light Hazard? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > G. Tim Stone > > > > > > > > G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC > > > > > > > > 117 Old Stage Rd. > > > > > > > > Essex Junction, VT. 05452 > > > > > > > > Cell: (802) 373-0638 > > > > > > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing > > list [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
