From Scottsdale FP’s website:

http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/fire/residential-sprinkler

Sounds as if you may schedule a visit from the fire department.

Best.

Bruce Verhei 

> On Feb 23, 2018, at 17:51, John Irwin <john.ir...@dynafire.com> wrote:
> 
> I understand the inspection is not required, but the sprinkler doesn't know 
> it's in a house and not a highrise. If asked I would reccomend they get 
> tested as they would in an NFPA 13 occupancy. 
> 
> ⁣John Irwin 
> DynaFire Inc. 
> Tampa Fire Sprinkler Division 
> 727-282-9243 
> 
> This email was sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity, 
> typographical errors, and grammatical gaffes.​
> 
>> On Feb 23, 2018, 8:41 PM, at 8:41 PM, Ron Greenman <rongreen...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> John. It’s different because the requirement is in 25 and 13d systems
>> are
>> exempt from 25. It would need to be a jurisdiction amendment to 25 or a
>> stand alone requirement.
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:29 PM John Irwin <john.ir...@dynafire.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Why would it be any different than a Residential sprinkler installed
>> in a
>>> dwelling unit in an NFPA 13 system?
>>> 
>>> ⁣John Irwin
>>> DynaFire Inc.
>>> Tampa Fire Sprinkler Division
>>> 727-282-9243
>>> 
>>> This email was sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity,
>>> typographical errors, and grammatical gaffes.​
>>> 
>>> On Feb 23, 2018, 7:25 PM, at 7:25 PM, Scott Futrell
>> <sco...@ffcdi.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Nothing in the original data sheet or the next generation about any
>>>> testing...
>>>> 
>>>> Scott
>>>> 
>>>> Office: (763) 425-1001 x2
>>>> Cell: (612) 759-5556
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Sprinklerforum
>>>> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> Bruce Verhei
>>>> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 6:19 PM
>>>> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Residential sprinkler question
>>>> 
>>>> [This message was identified as a phishing scam. Learn about
>> phishing
>>>> at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutPhishing]
>>>> 
>>>> What did the installation manual for the heads say? It’s part of the
>>>> listing.
>>>> 
>>>> Best.
>>>> 
>>>> Bruce Verhei
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 23, 2018, at 16:05, Scott Futrell <sco...@ffcdi.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Forumites:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scottsdale has required residential sprinklers since 1985 and
>> those
>>>> residential sprinklers are now more than twenty years old.  Is
>> anyone
>>>> performing or recommending twenty year inspections of these
>> sprinklers?
>>>> Obviously NFPA 25 doesn't apply to 13D systems, I know that, but if
>> you
>>>> have to test fast response after twenty years, why wouldn't it apply
>> to
>>>> residential systems?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Comments, thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scott Futrell
>>>>> Futrell Fire Consulty & Design, Inc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Office: (763) 425-1001 x2
>>>>> Cell: (612) 759-5556
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>>> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/private.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org/attachments/20180223/6f791d2a/attachment.html
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/private.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org/attachments/20180224/f88eaa68/attachment.html>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/private.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org/attachments/20180223/0e863dbf/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.firesprinkler.org/private.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org/attachments/20180223/78959156/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to