Thank you, Todd. Those were my thoughts as well. I just got word from the contractor that the local and state fire marshal is getting involved and indications are that they will agree with our interpretation that the sprinklers are needed.
Micah Davis, SET NICET #124745 Water Based Systems Layout, Level IV Dynamic Fire Designs Mail: [email protected] Mobile: 931-242-1299 www.dynamicfiredesigns.com<http://dynamicfiredesigns.com> Dynamic Fire Designs • 13063 County Line Rd., Box #87 • Spring Hill • FL • 34609 This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. ________________________________ From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> on behalf of Fpdcdesign <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 9:00 AM To: Sprinklerforum Subject: Re: Concealed Space Remember, the Appendix is not part of the standard, unless the appendices are specifically brought in by the Code. That section is purposely vague because the term “limited combustible” is open to interpretation since each situation is different. That needs to be an agreement between the Engineer of Record and the local AHJ as to what applies in each situation. You could also argue that the wood studs are indeed structural since the Sheetrock won’t stand up on its own. Something can be structural without being considered load bearing. Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT 860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-553-3553 (fax) 860-608-4559 (cell) On Jun 15, 2018 at 9:34 AM, <SET Micah Davis<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I have a project that has a concealed space with exposed wood wall framing. I added concealed space sprinklers per 8.15.1.2.1. The engineer is telling me to remove them stating that, since the walls are not load bearing, they are not structural walls. He then references Appendix A for 8.15.1.2.1 that states the requirements to protect the space does not apply for "nonstructural" wood. Has anyone seen this before? What is the opinion of the Forum? I will, of course, defer to the engineer, but I am recommending that the contractor I'm working with get a letter from the engineer clearly stating that they are requesting the sprinkler not be installed. Micah Davis, SET NICET #124745 Water Based Systems Layout, Level IV Dynamic Fire Designs Mail: [email protected] Mobile: 931-242-1299 www.dynamicfiredesigns.com<http://dynamicfiredesigns.com> Dynamic Fire Designs • 13063 County Line Rd., Box #87 • Spring Hill • FL • 34609 This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
