The EC-11 spaced at 14x14 is QR; spaced at 16x16 is SR. The center of the 
space is 16x16 and the perimeter is smaller
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
>   
> On Sep 27, 2022 at 2:40 PM,  <Matthew J Willis 
> (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
>   
>   
>           
>   
>
> Then your answer is SR.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> You indicated below they EC-11’s were installed as SR.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> SR is permitted in OH II.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> R/
>
>   
>
> Matt
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
>     
>
>   
>
>   Matthew J. Willis, CWBSP
>
>   
>
> Design Manager
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> Rapid Fire Protection, Inc.
>
>   
>
> 600 E. Carlson St. Suite AB | Cheyenne, WY. 82009
>
>   
>
> Office (307) 426-4077 ext. 404
>
>   
>
> Direct (307) 316-6630
>
>   
>
> Cell (605) 391-2733
>
>   
>
>
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> From:  Fpdcdesign  <[email protected]>
>   Sent:  Tuesday, September 27, 2022 12:35 PM
>   To:  Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers  
> <[email protected]>
>   Subject:  [Sprinklerforum] Re: Adding sprinklers to system with mixed SR/QR 
> listing
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
> This is a retail space. We have new sprinklers inside a soffit area and below 
> part of the soffit. It does not qualify as a compartment because the openings 
> are greater than 8 ft (about 30 ft). If a fire occurred inside the soffit 
> area, heat would be contained to that area. However, if a fire occurred under 
> the soffit, there could be sufficient heat each side to open sprinklers.   
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> Todd G Williams, PE
>
>   
>   
>
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> Stonington, CT
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> 860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> 860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> 860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>
>   
>   
>
>
>   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > On Sep 27, 2022 at 1:59 PM,  <Matthew J Willis 
> > (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Todd,
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> > What are you protecting?
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> > The wording for extending one hazard into another is a sufficient heat 
> > barrier.
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> > You may be chasing rabbits.
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> > R/
> >
> >   
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> >     
> >
> >   
> >
> >   Matthew J. Willis, CWBSP
> >
> >   
> >
> > Design Manager
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> > Rapid Fire Protection, Inc.
> >
> >   
> >
> > 600 E. Carlson St. Suite AB | Cheyenne, WY. 82009
> >
> >   
> >
> > Office (307) 426-4077 ext. 404
> >
> >   
> >
> > Direct (307) 316-6630
> >
> >   
> >
> > Cell (605) 391-2733
> >
> >   
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > From:  Fpdcdesign  <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
> >   Sent:  Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:04 AM
> >   To:  Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers  
> > <[email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])>
> >   Subject:  [Sprinklerforum] Re: Adding sprinklers to system with mixed 
> > SR/QR listing
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Compartment does not apply here.   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > The conclusion I and coming to is that we need to closely match the RTI of 
> > the new sprinklers to the RTI of the EC sprinkler, regardless of how the 
> > latter is listed.   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >
> >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > On Sep 27, 2022 at 8:15 AM,  <Sean Conlin 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > If the EC sprinkler used is listed as QR in its current application, then 
> > > the new area of work has to use QR unless the area of work is located in 
> > > a separate compartment.     Check the definition of compartment to see if 
> > > the soffit you mention can work for you.   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Sean W Conlin
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Demand Sprinkler Design Inc.   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > 37 Summerfield Crescent   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Brampton, ON L6X 4K4
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > P: 905 216-0922
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > On Sep 26, 2022, at 12:42 PM, Fpdcdesign  <[email protected] 
> > > > (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > I am working on to an addition to an existing system that has Tyco 
> > > > EC-11 pendent sprinklers. According to the data sheet, these sprinklers 
> > > > may be QR in some circumstances and SR in others. The addition I am 
> > > > working on will be using standard coverage sprinklers. The space is 
> > > > open to the area with the EC-11 sprinklers but separated by a deep 
> > > > soffit. The design of the EC-11 is such that they are considered 
> > > > standard response by the listing. The obvious question is QR or SR for 
> > > > the new sprinklers? I am assuming QR because that is closer to the 
> > > > response time of the EC-11s despite the SR listing, but I am being 
> > > > questioned on this. Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > Todd G Williams, PE
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > Stonington, CT
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > 860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > 860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > 860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  _________________________________________________________
> > > >  SprinklerForum mailing list:
> > > >    
> > > > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> > > >  To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > > > [email protected] 
> > > > (mailto:[email protected])
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >  _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> > > mailing list:   
> > > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> > >   To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > > [email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >  _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> > mailing list:   
> > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
> >  To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])
> >
> >   
> >   
>   
>   
>   
>  _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> mailing list: 
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>   
  
  
     
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to