This is a retail space. We have new sprinklers inside a soffit area and below 
part of the soffit. It does not qualify as a compartment because the openings 
are greater than 8 ft (about 30 ft). If a fire occurred inside the soffit area, 
heat would be contained to that area. However, if a fire occurred under the 
soffit, there could be sufficient heat each side to open sprinklers.   
  
  
  
 Todd G Williams, PE  
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
  
Stonington, CT
  
860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
  
860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
  
860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
  
  
  
  

  
  
>   
> On Sep 27, 2022 at 1:59 PM,  <Matthew J Willis 
> (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
>   
>   
>           
>   
>
> Todd,
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> What are you protecting?
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> The wording for extending one hazard into another is a sufficient heat 
> barrier.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> You may be chasing rabbits.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> R/
>
>   
>
> Matt
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
>     
>
>   
>
>   Matthew J. Willis, CWBSP
>
>   
>
> Design Manager
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> Rapid Fire Protection, Inc.
>
>   
>
> 600 E. Carlson St. Suite AB | Cheyenne, WY. 82009
>
>   
>
> Office (307) 426-4077 ext. 404
>
>   
>
> Direct (307) 316-6630
>
>   
>
> Cell (605) 391-2733
>
>   
>
>
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> From:  Fpdcdesign  <[email protected]>
>   Sent:  Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:04 AM
>   To:  Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers  
> <[email protected]>
>   Subject:  [Sprinklerforum] Re: Adding sprinklers to system with mixed SR/QR 
> listing
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
> Compartment does not apply here.   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> The conclusion I and coming to is that we need to closely match the RTI of 
> the new sprinklers to the RTI of the EC sprinkler, regardless of how the 
> latter is listed.   
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>
>   
>   
>
>
>   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > On Sep 27, 2022 at 8:15 AM,  <Sean Conlin 
> > (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > If the EC sprinkler used is listed as QR in its current application, then 
> > the new area of work has to use QR unless the area of work is located in a 
> > separate compartment.     Check the definition of compartment to see if the 
> > soffit you mention can work for you.   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Sean W Conlin
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Demand Sprinkler Design Inc.   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > 37 Summerfield Crescent   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Brampton, ON L6X 4K4
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > P: 905 216-0922
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >
> >   
> >
> >
> >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > On Sep 26, 2022, at 12:42 PM, Fpdcdesign  <[email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> >   
> >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > I am working on to an addition to an existing system that has Tyco EC-11 
> > > pendent sprinklers. According to the data sheet, these sprinklers may be 
> > > QR in some circumstances and SR in others. The addition I am working on 
> > > will be using standard coverage sprinklers. The space is open to the area 
> > > with the EC-11 sprinklers but separated by a deep soffit. The design of 
> > > the EC-11 is such that they are considered standard response by the 
> > > listing. The obvious question is QR or SR for the new sprinklers? I am 
> > > assuming QR because that is closer to the response time of the EC-11s 
> > > despite the SR listing, but I am being questioned on this. Thoughts?
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Todd G Williams, PE
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Stonington, CT
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > 860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > 860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > 860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >
> > >  _________________________________________________________
> > >  SprinklerForum mailing list:
> > >    
> > > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> > >  To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > > [email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >  _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> > mailing list:   
> > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
> >  To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])
> >
> >   
> >   
>   
>   
>   
>  _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> mailing list: 
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>   
  
  
     
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to