On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Carlos Córdoba <[email protected]>wrote:
> Jed, I think it would be better to just raise to "Critical" the priority > level of Issues that really need to be solved on the next release instead > of creating new labels because in a very short time we'd have too much of > them. > > Cheers, > Carlos > > You are free to change them back. I would argue that it becomes very difficult to decide which issues are really going to be addressed by which release unless you go to the level of including bug fixing releases in the list of milestones. Furthermore, it makes it very easy to create release notes when every issue is assigned to a specific release milestone. Just filter by that release. We should not go back and relabel things for old releases, but I don't see the harm in making it more explicit starting from today. And it's just one more integer in the label field. No need to conserve integers. There is an infinite supply of them :). Jed -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
