On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Pierre Raybaut <[email protected]>wrote:
> @Jed: I think that's a very good idea to add issue labels for each Spyder > release (e.g. "MS-v2.2.1", "MS-v2.2.2", etc.). This will clearly help us > sort/prioritize tasks for future releases. > > @Pierre: I would normally not advocate creating a v2.2.1 milestone and assigning issues to it before v2.2.0 is even released, but it seems in this case since v2.2.0 is such a big release there is bound to be a need for some micro bug fixing release before releasing v2.3.0. Would you mind adding v2.2.1 to the list of "standard" milestones through the project admin pages? Otherwise the issues list doesn't sort right if you try and sort on the MS column. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
