@Jed: I think that's a very good idea to add issue labels for each Spyder release (e.g. "MS-v2.2.1", "MS-v2.2.2", etc.). This will clearly help us sort/prioritize tasks for future releases.
2013/4/30 Jed Ludlow <[email protected]> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Carlos Córdoba <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Jed, I think it would be better to just raise to "Critical" the priority >> level of Issues that really need to be solved on the next release instead >> of creating new labels because in a very short time we'd have too much of >> them. >> >> Cheers, >> Carlos >> >> > You are free to change them back. I would argue that it becomes very > difficult to decide which issues are really going to be addressed by which > release unless you go to the level of including bug fixing releases in the > list of milestones. Furthermore, it makes it very easy to create release > notes when every issue is assigned to a specific release milestone. Just > filter by that release. We should not go back and relabel things for old > releases, but I don't see the harm in making it more explicit starting from > today. > > And it's just one more integer in the label field. No need to conserve > integers. There is an infinite supply of them :). > > Jed > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "spyder" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
