Consider using an automated filtering system. Your MTA may be able to
filter sqlite-users messages for you.


On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 05:02, Steve O'Hara wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I suppose this has to be the most boring topic that I've seen on SQLite
> listservers for the past 2 years.  However, since the switch away from
> Yahoo, it has revealed how much I relied on the communication features of
> the listserver.
> 
> The new listserver is making it very difficult for me to "keep with the
> programme".  I get some 50 emails per day from various sources and I can't
> afford to have SQLite traffic adding to this list.  However, I do want to
> get a daily digest of what's happening and to contribute if there is a topic
> on which I think I can usefully comment.
> 
> I'm a Windows (followed by Unix then VMS) guy and I use Outlook to view my
> email.  The digest comes in the form of categorised headers (good) and a
> long list of attachments (bad).  Outlook doesn't show me the full title of
> the attachments so I have to open every one of them to try and follow a
> thread.  It's so off-putting, that i would un-subscribe from the list if
> there were an alternative way of viewing the listserver e.g. web interface.
> 
> I can fully understand the reasons for moving away from Yahoo and I
> appreciate the continued efforts of all those involved in providing the new
> service. But, it's a retrograde step for me and I suspect for others too.
> Okay, I might be the fool on the hill whose input isn't that useful anyway,
> but I'd really like to stay involved and the new mechanism is making it hard
> for me.
> 
> The "reply-to"/"replay to all" debate is too puerile to even comment
> on......
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to