Le ven 23/07/2004 à 14:38, Jay Macaulay a écrit : > Removing the Reply-To makes me have to view the mail properties, find the > From email, then type that in. On the other hand, if I wanted to reply to > the list before and not to a person directly, all I had to do was hilight > the name and delete it. A lot less painful than the other way around IMHO.
This is indeed all the more annoying as every other list I'm subscribed to (thats makes about 2 dozens) behaves in a 'classic' way: hitting 'reply to' answers the poster, while 'reply to all' replies to the poster and the list. Sometimes, you don't want to pollute the list with an answer that has qlready be given a billion times... such as the classic smbfs-is-not-samba response that I send privately about 5 times a week on the samba list -it's there in the archive alright but people don't read the archives- which is about the only miserable piece of knowledge I can share. I guess if pepole saw it all the time they would get sick of me quite quickly. Still, I could help quite a few people with this one. So, what I mean is this: if it's harder to send a private response, You can bet a lot of recurrent questions might end up unanswered. -- *********************************************** [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
