Le ven 23/07/2004 à 14:38, Jay Macaulay a écrit :
> Removing the Reply-To makes me have to view the mail properties, find the
> From email, then type that in.  On the other hand, if I wanted to reply to
> the list before and not to a person directly, all I had to do was hilight
> the name and delete it.  A lot less painful than the other way around IMHO.

This is indeed all the more annoying as every other list I'm subscribed
to (thats makes about 2 dozens) behaves in a 'classic' way: hitting
'reply to' answers the poster, while 'reply to all' replies to the
poster and the list.

Sometimes, you don't want to pollute the list with an answer that has
qlready be given a billion times... such as the classic
smbfs-is-not-samba response that I send privately about 5 times a week
on the samba list -it's there in the archive alright but people don't
read the archives- which is about the only miserable piece of knowledge
I can share. I guess if pepole saw it all the time they would get sick
of me quite quickly. Still, I could help quite a few people with this
one.

So, what I mean is this: if it's harder to send a private response, You
can bet a lot of recurrent questions might end up unanswered.

-- 
***********************************************
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=

Reply via email to