Le sam 24/07/2004 à 04:03, Darren Duncan a écrit : > At 11:49 AM -0500 7/23/04, Greg Miller wrote: > >There are certainly a few drawbacks to using Reply-To, but I can't > >remember the last time I was on a mailing list that didn't make use > >of it. Clearly, there's a very solid consensus out there that > >Reply-To is the way to go. > > That may be because a large fraction of email lists use something > like Yahoogroups, which often uses reply-to-group as a default > setting, though thankfully Yahoo lets you turn that option off. -- > Darren Duncan
I just checked and, for instance, samba-users and security focus lists use the classic behaviour: no reply-to munging. So I think it would be great if it was a user option so everyone could stick to their little habits. -- *********************************************** [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
