On 11/1/05, René Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jay Sprenkle wrote: > > >If you're going to become less compliant perhaps it would be less > >misleading to remove the "SQL" from the project name. I'm not saying > >either is a bad idea, just that the name shouldn't be misleading. > > > > > I think this is kind of 'purist fetisjism'. Personally I like the > pragmatic approach more: make thinks work the way you want it to work. > Btw calling SQLite not worth the letters 'SQL' is imho just lame..
Hey Rene, I think having my suggestion called "lame" and "purist fetishism" was rude and uncalled for. I have no problem with DRH's proposal either. I didn't intend to imply it's of less worth than SQL, merely that the name was misleading if it wasn't going to be standards compliant. How about this instead: Offer an "SQLite" and an "SQLite Classic".
