On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 1:40 am, Dominique Pellé <dominique.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > On 12/14/19, Dominique Pellé <dominique.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I'm curious about what kind of change reduces memory per > > > connection. > > > > > > > The branch is here: > https://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?r=mini-lookaside-take-2 > > > > I'll try to add more description later - busy with other things right > > this moment. > > Ah, it about lookaside. I build with SQLITE_OMIT_LOOKASIDE > so I suppose the mini-lookaside-take-2 branch will do nothing then > in this case. > > Regards > Dominique > _______________________________________________ Gut feel is that the divide will fall such that embedded use cases want the memory and PC or equivalent use cases want the CPU. I fall into the latter so inevitably want the performance since 72k doesn't really move the needle on our usage but we've found ourselves CPU bound a few times. If that split on the usefulness is correct, is it reasonable to suggest that since embedded cases will use switches to exclude everything they don't need this should fall into that category? I'm obviously just speculating on that front having not used it there myself. Regards, Donald Shepherd. > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
