Perhaps, when is the next release due? I'd be interested to see the differences, if an upgrade reduces memory overhead that significantly it would be most excellent :)
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D. Richard Hipp Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 2:43 PM To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [sqlite] Reducing SQLite Memory footprint(!) On Aug 20, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Brown, Daniel wrote: > I just upgraded to the latest version (3.6.1) of the pre-processed C > source code from the website, running the test again gives me similar > results of 22.2 MB used and 24.55 MB high water from the same 9 MB > file. > Is there any way it could be the file that is causing the extra memory > usage? I'll try rebuilding it next. > > My tests were based on CVS HEAD, which contains a newly rewritten page cache, and hence entirely new code for managing in-memory databases. Perhaps some kind of bug has been fixed since 3.6.1 that causes it to use less memory. D. Richard Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
