Looking in process explorer on XP after the disc database detached should a memory size change of 28 MB of RAM in the test application, I assumed this was the size of the database in memory.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D. Richard Hipp Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:44 AM To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [sqlite] Reducing SQLite Memory footprint(!) On Aug 19, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Brown, Daniel wrote: > SQLite is very memory > intensive compared to our current solution (although SQLite is faster > and more feature rich), e.g. 9MB for our current solution versus 28 MB > for SQLite with the same source data. Where did you get the 28MB figure? The sqlite3_analyzer output you posted tells me that the total database size is a little over 9MB, not 28MB. D. Richard Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
