-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fred Williams wrote:
> I say there is no known translation that
> would allow the three SQLite, "Small, Fast, Reliable" adjectives to
> translate into any regurgitated language output, with the exception of
> compiling SQLite source with a C++ compiler :-)

If you read Bernstein's retrospective on qmail, one of his suggestions is to
write code in a higher level language (especially more secure in the sense
that C isn't such as preventing buffer & integer overflows etc) that is then
transcoded to C.  (Some conspiracy theorists looking at his code claimed he
actually did do this :-)

So in theory given unlimited CPU and memory it should be possible to take
the SQLite C code and turn it into something higher level and then turn that
back into the more verbose platforms (.NET, Java).  The big advantage of
this approach (after the upfront work) is that keeping up with SQLite
progress is easy.

Roger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkqCTmwACgkQmOOfHg372QSCUwCeKD+V+e7yjYgbcF9e+lXhAbbE
U9cAoIzXPblugsswnhbgnmTNYSrkdMj7
=VYQ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to