That's the problem any more it seems. Everyone "assumes" unlimited CPU and memory :-)
Give a guy a Cray and he'll write one hell of a "Solitaire"! -----Original Message----- From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of Roger Binns Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:09 AM To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLJet - pure Java implementation of SQLite -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fred Williams wrote: > I say there is no known translation that > would allow the three SQLite, "Small, Fast, Reliable" adjectives to > translate into any regurgitated language output, with the exception of > compiling SQLite source with a C++ compiler :-) If you read Bernstein's retrospective on qmail, one of his suggestions is to write code in a higher level language (especially more secure in the sense that C isn't such as preventing buffer & integer overflows etc) that is then transcoded to C. (Some conspiracy theorists looking at his code claimed he actually did do this :-) So in theory given unlimited CPU and memory it should be possible to take the SQLite C code and turn it into something higher level and then turn that back into the more verbose platforms (.NET, Java). The big advantage of this approach (after the upfront work) is that keeping up with SQLite progress is easy. Roger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqCTmwACgkQmOOfHg372QSCUwCeKD+V+e7yjYgbcF9e+lXhAbbE U9cAoIzXPblugsswnhbgnmTNYSrkdMj7 =VYQ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
