On 12 Aug 2009, at 4:25pm, Jim Showalter wrote: > Perhaps it would be better to translate the object code. > > It's also possible to translate bytecode (for example, from Java to > .NET).
Well since we're talking about SQLite here, another opportunity presents itself, because SQLite3 has its own bytecode which executes on a virtual machine. Divide the SQLite code into two: the code which runs the virtual machine and the rest, and implement them two different ways. You might get enhanced portability and greater flexibility. Or you might get a complete mess. See http://www.sqlite.org/opcode.html for more information. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
