I had the impression that the NestedVM version worked under Linux only, is this incorrect?
g -----Original Message----- From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Roger Binns Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:54 PM To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLJet - pure Java implementation of SQLite -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fred Williams wrote: > I seem to remember, haven't done it in years, Borand's C and C++ compilers > could output Assembler source. One could conceivably take that output and > translate it into almost any foreign CPU's native Assembler with great > efficiency I would think. That is pretty much how NestedVM works. You compile whatever language code you want with gcc and target the MIPS processor. (MIPS is regular and simple.) NestedVM then translates the MIPS object code into Java bytecode. > Opps! Straying a long way from SQLite! Not really. There is already a Java version of SQLite built using NestedVM. The OP hasn't answered my question about why he doesn't like the NestedVM approach. The recent reimplementation of SQLite in C# shows there is interest in it being "native" for various virtual environments, but with the exception of the NestedVM approach all seem to require a lot of work just to keep up with SQLite native C source. Roger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqDK9IACgkQmOOfHg372QS29wCgjqjMuswg2o8oQxvAMo2ZEpVK Mj4An2qeh8R0xTUkwmBmJ7l8f5MUQBVe =6LJA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
