For clarity, here is the currently policy for Reply-to as it is set in
Mailman:


   - Should any existing Reply-To: header found in the original message be
   stripped? If so, this will be done regardless of whether an explict
   Reply-To: header is added by Mailman or not. : *NO*
   - Where are replies to list messages directed? *This list*
   - Explicit Reply-To: header : *None*


On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:04 PM, R.Smith <rsmith at rsweb.co.za> wrote:

>
>
> On 2015-03-03 12:42 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
>
>> I think that what needs to be done is for each foo at sqlite.org to return
>> an error/undeliverable message if someone sends a message to it, citing
>> that all messages must be explicitly sent to the corresponding
>> foo at mailinglists.sqlite.org.  That should handily solve the problem. --
>> Darren Duncan
>>
>
> I see where you are coming from, but if the Reply-To field contains 2
> email addresses and then the server penalizes you for using one of them,
> that might go down in history as the most-evil mailing-list quirk of all
> time.
>
> As to Mike's post - the dual mailing-list's reason for being is very clear
> and welcomed, no qualms there, just the Reply-to duplication that is
> quirky. I read all forum emails, I do not recall any multi-person decision
> to add this dual Reply-To thing, however memory is not my strength so I'm
> happy with the explanation - but I am wondering - is this done and dusted?
> Is there any chance we might re-open the discussion now that real-World
> scenarios have set in?
>
> It's an extremely minor irritation and will cause a few extra mail-traffic
> items at its worst - the only real casualty being my OCD, but I can't help
> thinking there is not a single good reason to keep the situation (unless
> someone can show the opposite).
>
>
>
>
>> On 2015-03-02 10:37 AM, Mike Owens wrote:
>>
>>> For what it is worth, the move to mailinglists.sqlite.org is a result of
>>> the Mailman web interface having to be hosted under the following two
>>> constraints:
>>>
>>> 1. It must be on port 80
>>> 2. It cannot be on sqlite.org port 80
>>>
>>> I explained this reasoning in a previous email. The short version is
>>> because we are using two web servers on the VM that hosts both the
>>> sqlite.org website and fossil repos (althttpd) and the Mailman web
>>> interface (Apache). We previously did this on a single IP where mailman
>>> was
>>> on port 8080. However, we had a significant number of complaints from
>>> people who could not reach the Mailman web interface via sqlite.org:8080
>>> due to firewall restrictions in their respective locations. So we did
>>> what
>>> we could to move it to port 80.
>>>
>>> So to satisfy these two constraints, mailinglists.sqlite.org was born.
>>> Unless somebody else knows better, Mailman does not allow one to use two
>>> domains for a given list. Either something will screw up with the mail
>>> routing or in the web interface if you try to use more than one. You have
>>> to pick one domain and stick with it. Thus I could not continue to
>>> support
>>> both the previous sqlite.org (:8080) domain and the new
>>> mailinglists.sqlite.org (:80) for the users list. So I made the move
>>> from
>>> the one to the other.
>>>
>>> Regarding the reply-to policy. I honestly don't remember the reasoning
>>> behind it. I know there was a big long discussion about it in the past
>>> (search the list) and after the dust settled we chose the current policy
>>> and that is the way it is configured today.  I do believe the policy was
>>> a
>>> result of the consensus of the mailing list users. I can say that we do
>>> everything we can to make most of the people happy most of the time. That
>>> is the very reason we made this change to begin with -- to make it
>>> possible
>>> for everyone to use the list. It would have been easier to just keep
>>> things
>>> the same and let the people who can't reach port 8080 deal with it, but
>>> we
>>> did what we had to to make it accessible for them as well. There are a
>>> lot
>>> of variables in the system and we juggle them as best we can.
>>>
>>> Any feedback or suggestions are always welcome.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:18 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 12:45 +0200, R.Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I've found the source of the list duplications.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some emails (Such as the one by J.K. Lowden 2-March-2015 re: Characters
>>>>> corrupt after importing...) contains a "Reply-To" field in the header
>>>>> with both list addresses which must have sneaked in there due to some
>>>>> automatic list feature.  (By "Both" I mean the old:
>>>>> sqlite-users at sqlite.org and the new:
>>>>>
>>>> sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org)
>>>>
>>>> You don't need that, do you? Just hitting Reply All to a message which
>>>> is:
>>>>   To: sqlite-users at sqlite.org
>>>>   Reply-To: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
>>>>
>>>> would generate a message which ends up going to both, wouldn't it?
>>>>
>>>> (I can't easily test; I've configured my mailer to ignore abusive
>>>> Reply-To: headers from mailing lists where it can detect them, so my
>>>> Reply and Reply All buttons actually do what I *ask* them to.)
>>>>
>>>> But looking at the first message in the 'PhD Student' thread, it appears
>>>> just as in my example above. And John KcKown's response of 26 Feb 2015
>>>> 07:16:47 -0600 is indeed to both addresses, as if he'd done the correct
>>>> thing and simply hit 'Reply All'.
>>>>
>>>>  I usually use the "Reply to List" button (Thunderbird) which replies
>>>>> correctly,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note that that is considered extremely anti-social in many cases,
>>>> because it cuts some people out of discussions entirely. See
>>>> http://david.woodhou.se/reply-to-list.html for a full discussion.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> dwmw2
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sqlite-users mailing list
>> sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
>> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
Mike

Reply via email to