For clarity, here is the currently policy for Reply-to as it is set in Mailman:
- Should any existing Reply-To: header found in the original message be stripped? If so, this will be done regardless of whether an explict Reply-To: header is added by Mailman or not. : *NO* - Where are replies to list messages directed? *This list* - Explicit Reply-To: header : *None* On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:04 PM, R.Smith <rsmith at rsweb.co.za> wrote: > > > On 2015-03-03 12:42 AM, Darren Duncan wrote: > >> I think that what needs to be done is for each foo at sqlite.org to return >> an error/undeliverable message if someone sends a message to it, citing >> that all messages must be explicitly sent to the corresponding >> foo at mailinglists.sqlite.org. That should handily solve the problem. -- >> Darren Duncan >> > > I see where you are coming from, but if the Reply-To field contains 2 > email addresses and then the server penalizes you for using one of them, > that might go down in history as the most-evil mailing-list quirk of all > time. > > As to Mike's post - the dual mailing-list's reason for being is very clear > and welcomed, no qualms there, just the Reply-to duplication that is > quirky. I read all forum emails, I do not recall any multi-person decision > to add this dual Reply-To thing, however memory is not my strength so I'm > happy with the explanation - but I am wondering - is this done and dusted? > Is there any chance we might re-open the discussion now that real-World > scenarios have set in? > > It's an extremely minor irritation and will cause a few extra mail-traffic > items at its worst - the only real casualty being my OCD, but I can't help > thinking there is not a single good reason to keep the situation (unless > someone can show the opposite). > > > > >> On 2015-03-02 10:37 AM, Mike Owens wrote: >> >>> For what it is worth, the move to mailinglists.sqlite.org is a result of >>> the Mailman web interface having to be hosted under the following two >>> constraints: >>> >>> 1. It must be on port 80 >>> 2. It cannot be on sqlite.org port 80 >>> >>> I explained this reasoning in a previous email. The short version is >>> because we are using two web servers on the VM that hosts both the >>> sqlite.org website and fossil repos (althttpd) and the Mailman web >>> interface (Apache). We previously did this on a single IP where mailman >>> was >>> on port 8080. However, we had a significant number of complaints from >>> people who could not reach the Mailman web interface via sqlite.org:8080 >>> due to firewall restrictions in their respective locations. So we did >>> what >>> we could to move it to port 80. >>> >>> So to satisfy these two constraints, mailinglists.sqlite.org was born. >>> Unless somebody else knows better, Mailman does not allow one to use two >>> domains for a given list. Either something will screw up with the mail >>> routing or in the web interface if you try to use more than one. You have >>> to pick one domain and stick with it. Thus I could not continue to >>> support >>> both the previous sqlite.org (:8080) domain and the new >>> mailinglists.sqlite.org (:80) for the users list. So I made the move >>> from >>> the one to the other. >>> >>> Regarding the reply-to policy. I honestly don't remember the reasoning >>> behind it. I know there was a big long discussion about it in the past >>> (search the list) and after the dust settled we chose the current policy >>> and that is the way it is configured today. I do believe the policy was >>> a >>> result of the consensus of the mailing list users. I can say that we do >>> everything we can to make most of the people happy most of the time. That >>> is the very reason we made this change to begin with -- to make it >>> possible >>> for everyone to use the list. It would have been easier to just keep >>> things >>> the same and let the people who can't reach port 8080 deal with it, but >>> we >>> did what we had to to make it accessible for them as well. There are a >>> lot >>> of variables in the system and we juggle them as best we can. >>> >>> Any feedback or suggestions are always welcome. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:18 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 12:45 +0200, R.Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, I've found the source of the list duplications. >>>>> >>>>> Some emails (Such as the one by J.K. Lowden 2-March-2015 re: Characters >>>>> corrupt after importing...) contains a "Reply-To" field in the header >>>>> with both list addresses which must have sneaked in there due to some >>>>> automatic list feature. (By "Both" I mean the old: >>>>> sqlite-users at sqlite.org and the new: >>>>> >>>> sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org) >>>> >>>> You don't need that, do you? Just hitting Reply All to a message which >>>> is: >>>> To: sqlite-users at sqlite.org >>>> Reply-To: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org >>>> >>>> would generate a message which ends up going to both, wouldn't it? >>>> >>>> (I can't easily test; I've configured my mailer to ignore abusive >>>> Reply-To: headers from mailing lists where it can detect them, so my >>>> Reply and Reply All buttons actually do what I *ask* them to.) >>>> >>>> But looking at the first message in the 'PhD Student' thread, it appears >>>> just as in my example above. And John KcKown's response of 26 Feb 2015 >>>> 07:16:47 -0600 is indeed to both addresses, as if he'd done the correct >>>> thing and simply hit 'Reply All'. >>>> >>>> I usually use the "Reply to List" button (Thunderbird) which replies >>>>> correctly, >>>>> >>>> >>>> Note that that is considered extremely anti-social in many cases, >>>> because it cuts some people out of discussions entirely. See >>>> http://david.woodhou.se/reply-to-list.html for a full discussion. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> dwmw2 >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> sqlite-users mailing list >> sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org >> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- Mike