On 02/21/2010 04:26 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > sön 2010-02-21 klockan 15:14 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov: > >> Please note that the CPU affinity hack where every process gets its own >> core would not work if ${process_name} is not a number, but we can come >> up with another hack to support that without enumerating all >> processes/cores. > > From what I can tell that is about the only case where a number is > really needed. But some simple conditionals and pattern rules can solve > that.
Agreed. > Another case would be multiple processes each listening on a port of > it's own.. > > 8000 > 8001 > 8002 > 8003 > etc.. Yeah. Supporting this would also require adding support for integer math though. How about adding support for both ${process_name} and ${process_number}? process_name: squid1, squid2, ... squidN, cache1, cache2, ... values; process_number: 1, 2, ... N, N+1, N+2, ... values. Thank you, Alex.