Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 02/21/2010 04:26 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
sön 2010-02-21 klockan 15:14 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov:
Please note that the CPU affinity hack where every process gets its own
core would not work if ${process_name} is not a number, but we can come
up with another hack to support that without enumerating all
processes/cores.
From what I can tell that is about the only case where a number is
really needed. But some simple conditionals and pattern rules can solve
that.
Agreed.
Is there any kind of kernel core labeling? that would be nicer to link
into than a blind core=N if it exists.
/just a thought.
Another case would be multiple processes each listening on a port of
it's own..
8000
8001
8002
8003
etc..
Yeah. Supporting this would also require adding support for integer math
though.
How about adding support for both ${process_name} and ${process_number}?
process_name: squid1, squid2, ... squidN, cache1, cache2, ... values;
process_number: 1, 2, ... N, N+1, N+2, ... values.
+1. yes that gets around the possible macro confusions. Or if thats
going to take too much time to do both, just the name one accepting
labels would be great.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE24
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.16
