Julius Thyssen wrote: > Just so you know; > Reverting back to SquirrelMail/1.4.5 [CVS] solved it.
1.4.5 has been released, so 1.4.5cvs is not very accurate unless you speak of a pre-release cvs snapshot of 1.4.5 (in which case now you are vulnerable to several known security issues). > Maybe that helps. > > By the way; I always need to patch files because of the > enormous message-ID-length and header-slack > created by the Delivery class files etc. > It would be great if these parts were all optional. > Personally I believe all those headers are a drag, > and like to switch off "User Agent", as well as > "Squirrelmail auth user" with the date and time > added yet another useless time, in my opinion this > is really too much. It's bad enough each e-mail > now has about 20 lines of virus-scanning and spam- > checking headers in them, we don't want more. If you want less accurate and less secure emails, that is your choice, but you won't see them dropped by default from the SquirrelMail software any time soon. Happy Squirreling. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: [email protected] List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
