abalashov left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4800)
> I think this is a little harsh, especially considering @space88man is part of
> the dev team and also introduced this in an email as well as his past
> contributions to TLS and the project. I understand the current bias, but
> believe this comment is unwarranted.
I don't think it is. The most one can say based on this pedigree is that he
might be in a better position to do it than the average drive-by slop-slinger,
but it's still not organised in a way that takes into account the modalities of
ingestion by the open-source organism.
There is a legitimate argument for adding a “distributor thread” to the TCP
side of Kamailio (UDP already has this in 6.0+), versus just having forked
processes nibble at the kernel trough. But this is not the way to do it. Large
slop PRs of this nature are anti-collaborative; I don't care if Hawking or
Einstein or Dijkstra wrote them.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4800#issuecomment-4855697071
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4800/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
