fredposner left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4800)
> > I think this is a little harsh, especially considering @space88man is part
> > of the dev team and also introduced this in an email as well as his past
> > contributions to TLS and the project. I understand the current bias, but
> > believe this comment is unwarranted.
>
> I don't think it is. The most one can say based on this pedigree is that he
> might be in a better position to do it than the average drive-by
> slop-slinger, but it's still not organised in a way that takes into account
> the modalities of ingestion by the open-source organism.
>
> There is a legitimate argument for adding a “distributor thread” to the TCP
> side of Kamailio (UDP already has this in 6.0+), versus just having forked
> processes nibble at the kernel trough. But this is not the way to do it.
> Large slop PRs of this nature are anti-collaborative; I don't care if Hawking
> or Einstein or Dijkstra wrote them.
There is a method of expressing in a more respectful manner, which is what is
[expected](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
here to both encourage participation and maintain a healthy community. I'm
asking that you _please_ find a more respectful way of expressing your concerns.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4800#issuecomment-4855877323
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4800/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
