> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg A. Woods)
>
> That would be nice, but it won't matter much so long as we have at least
> one good "open" implementation of the final IETF sanctioned protocol,
> and it seems that will be the case, and it'll happen sooner if some of
> us stop being lazy and put some effort into supporting those
> implementations of 2.x that are already proceeding and/or writing our
> own implementations.
>
I know about the gnu-ssh effort, but what other open source
projects are going on??? I would be most interested in taking a look at
and contributing to alternative efforts since the development team on
the "official" code-line seem to be doing it in a very closed-box
way...
As this proceeds towards becoming an IETF standard, I have
no problem working on the "other" teams to get to the inter-operability
level required for a standards track effort.
Regards,
b c++'ing u,
%-) sjs
PS: I am my own employer, therefore: "all opinions are twice spoken for;"
and they do, in fact, scare the hell out of said employer!!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Jon Silverman - President SJS Associates, N.A., Inc.
Suite 15-B
Inter-/Intra-Net Architecture, Implementation & Security 698 West End Avenue
New York, NY 10025
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 212 662 9450
Website: http://www.sjsinc.com Fax: 212 662 9461
Text-Page: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 917 929 1668
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down!!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
