On 05/31/2016 02:42 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 05/30/2016 05:49 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 05/30/2016 10:42 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 05/27/2016 04:32 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I have new version of this patch set.
I fixed CI tests on debian [1]. My thanks belongs to Lukas and Nikolai.
[1] http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/44/04/summary.html
Regards
Ack to the patches, I'm running CI now. The only thing I'm worried about
is that we're using blocking calls getpwnam_r and similar. We already do
this on some parts of sssd but looking into the cases it's either
initialization or a very rare condition or a data provider.
Here we block for every local object and since this is an NSS responder
I think we should create a non-blocking way rather sooner than later. It
will be for free when sssd will manage local users though so I'm not
sure if it's worth the work.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
Hi Pavel,
thanks for review.
I know that CI tests failed [1].
Actually this CI tests passed [2].
[1] http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/44/05/summary.html
[2] http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/44/07/summary.html
With your patches, two tests sometimes fails and sometimes not. With
master it seems to always succeed.
[1] http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/44/05/summary.html
ldap_test.py::test_add_remove_group_rfc2307 PASSED
ldap_test.py::test_add_remove_group_rfc2307_bis FAILED
[2] http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/44/08/summary.html
ldap_test.py::test_add_remove_group_rfc2307 FAILED
ldap_test.py::test_add_remove_group_rfc2307_bis PASSED
I do not know whether it is related to your patches or it is a random bug.
Hi Pavel,
I think this is not related to my patch.
Regards
--
Petr^4 Čech
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
