On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Mathias Krause <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ...Albeit by looking closer at the implementation of flush_old_exec()
> I think we should just move the set_fs() call there and remove it from
> the architecture dependent implementations of flush_thread() and
> start_thread().
Yeah, that sounds like the sane (and safe - it won't matter if there
are some architectures that get overlooked and then have a duplicate
set_fs() somewhere) approach.
Linus
_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
