On 09.06.2011, 17:56 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Mathias Krause <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ...Albeit by looking closer at the implementation of flush_old_exec() >> I think we should just move the set_fs() call there and remove it from >> the architecture dependent implementations of flush_thread() and >> start_thread(). > > Yeah, that sounds like the sane (and safe - it won't matter if there > are some architectures that get overlooked and then have a duplicate > set_fs() somewhere) approach.
So the only question left: Should it be one patch moving the set_fs() call to flush_old_exec() and also removing the redundant calls in flush_thread() and start_thread() or should that be split into one for the set_fs() move and multiple ones for the arch specific set_fs() remove? Mathias _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
