On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Mathias Krause <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So the only question left: Should it be one patch moving the set_fs() call to
> flush_old_exec() and also removing the redundant calls in flush_thread() and
> start_thread() or should that be split into one for the set_fs() move and
> multiple ones for the arch specific set_fs() remove?
I'd suggest one patch that moves the set_fs(), and then possibly
removes the ones from architectures that who-ever wrote the patch can
actively test.
Doing random other architectures is not worth the effort or confusion, imho.
Linus
_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
