>> 1) Why not use user-specified handle (meta-contact name) instead of >> some opaque "tag"? > > Sure, you could do that too (unlness I overlook something, It's been > some time). I'll clarify this.
"The value of the 'tag' is used as a non-human readable unique identifier for a metacontact." I think it would be nice to drop the "non-human readable" part. Actually, making it a human readable name would allow users to name metacontacts. >> 2) How are these meta-contact data supposed to be scattered across >> multiple accounts? I really didn't get this part. (clarification >> needed?) > > Every account needs to store the tags of its contacts separately. Same > tag on different account == same metacontact. > > I'll add some clarification about this. > So this apply only for clients that allow multiple accounts connected simultaneously, without rosters being separated (Gajim's merged mode), right? Ok, that was obvious... sorry for asking.. :)
