Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: >>> 1) Why not use user-specified handle (meta-contact name) instead of >>> some opaque "tag"? >> Sure, you could do that too (unlness I overlook something, It's been >> some time). I'll clarify this. > > "The value of the 'tag' is used as a non-human readable unique > identifier for a metacontact." > I think it would be nice to drop the "non-human readable" part. > Actually, making it a human readable name would allow users to name > metacontacts.
each contact has its own name, there is not a name for the "group" of contacts. I don't see how it could be usefull to have a name from the metacontact "group". -- Yann
