2009/1/22 Yann Leboulanger <[email protected]>: > each contact has its own name, there is not a name for the "group" of > contacts. > I don't see how it could be usefull to have a name from the metacontact > "group". >
I think it could be useful in some scenarios. Example: [email protected] - "Contact - Company" [email protected] - "Contact - GTalk" [email protected] - "Contact - ICQ" ---------------------------------------------------------------- Metacontact - "Contact" Rationale: every sub-contact can have some explanation/specification/location specified in name Perhaps it would not be very useful for most people, I don't know. I personally would use it in this way.
