On 4/8/09 8:15 AM, Fabio Forno wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Should the client assume that the resources 'bla' and 'foo' are offline now? >> I think that presence about a bare JID is meaningless. >> > > Many components send presence from [n...@]component.domain without > resources. I've always interpreted that as the null resource (while > just "/" should be the resource with length zero) and treated it as if > it were a XMPP entity. >
I mean that concept of presence in relation to an entity whose service discovery identity is "account/registered" doesn't tell you anything. For (user) accounts, presence matters for connected resources, not the bare account itself. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
