On 4/17/09 12:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 4/17/09 12:43 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: >> 2009/4/17 Leonid Evdokimov <[email protected]>: >>> ... >>> >>> So the first method works like trivial VCS and the second one works like >>> rsync or incremental tar. What method is actually described in the XEP ? >>> Seems, that will also answer Jiří's question about `treat as normal` >>> statement. >>> >> The general idea of this thread is to say what should XEP actually >> describe, right? ;) Can you please comment my example? I'd like to >> know what you think. > > I *think* we have consensus, but I'm still pondering it. I will update > the spec accordingly to make sure that I understand it.
Before I get too far in the spec updates, here is an example. Client thinks version is 299. Server thinks it is 309. To simplify, consider every odd version number to be significant (the server will be pushing 301, 303, 305, 307, 309). So: C: IQ-get [299] S: IQ-result S: push [301] S: push [303] S: push [305] </stream:stream> C: IQ-get [305] S: push [307] S: push [309] Yes? /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
