2009/4/17 Jiří Zárevúcký <[email protected]>: > 2009/4/17 Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>: >> On 4/17/09 12:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> On 4/17/09 12:43 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: >>>> 2009/4/17 Leonid Evdokimov <[email protected]>: >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> So the first method works like trivial VCS and the second one works like >>>>> rsync or incremental tar. What method is actually described in the XEP ? >>>>> Seems, that will also answer Jiří's question about `treat as normal` >>>>> statement. >>>>> >>>> The general idea of this thread is to say what should XEP actually >>>> describe, right? ;) Can you please comment my example? I'd like to >>>> know what you think. >>> >>> I *think* we have consensus, but I'm still pondering it. I will update >>> the spec accordingly to make sure that I understand it. >> >> Before I get too far in the spec updates, here is an example. >> >> Client thinks version is 299. Server thinks it is 309. To simplify, >> consider every odd version number to be significant (the server will be >> pushing 301, 303, 305, 307, 309). So: >> >> C: IQ-get [299] >> S: IQ-result >> S: push [301] >> S: push [303] >> S: push [305] >> </stream:stream> >> C: IQ-get [305] >> S: push [307] >> S: push [309] >> >> Yes? >> > > That's right. >
But you forget the second IQ-result. :)
