On 4/17/09 1:01 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: > 2009/4/17 Jiří Zárevúcký <[email protected]>: >> 2009/4/17 Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>: >>> On 4/17/09 12:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>> On 4/17/09 12:43 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: >>>>> 2009/4/17 Leonid Evdokimov <[email protected]>: >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> So the first method works like trivial VCS and the second one works like >>>>>> rsync or incremental tar. What method is actually described in the XEP ? >>>>>> Seems, that will also answer Jiří's question about `treat as normal` >>>>>> statement. >>>>>> >>>>> The general idea of this thread is to say what should XEP actually >>>>> describe, right? ;) Can you please comment my example? I'd like to >>>>> know what you think. >>>> I *think* we have consensus, but I'm still pondering it. I will update >>>> the spec accordingly to make sure that I understand it. >>> Before I get too far in the spec updates, here is an example. >>> >>> Client thinks version is 299. Server thinks it is 309. To simplify, >>> consider every odd version number to be significant (the server will be >>> pushing 301, 303, 305, 307, 309). So: >>> >>> C: IQ-get [299] >>> S: IQ-result >>> S: push [301] >>> S: push [303] >>> S: push [305] >>> </stream:stream> >>> C: IQ-get [305] >>> S: push [307] >>> S: push [309] >>> >>> Yes? >>> >> That's right. >> > > But you forget the second IQ-result. :)
Well, sure, typed it up fast. :P
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
