2009/4/17 Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>: > On 4/17/09 12:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 4/17/09 12:43 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: >>> 2009/4/17 Leonid Evdokimov <[email protected]>: >>>> ... >>>> >>>> So the first method works like trivial VCS and the second one works like >>>> rsync or incremental tar. What method is actually described in the XEP ? >>>> Seems, that will also answer Jiří's question about `treat as normal` >>>> statement. >>>> >>> The general idea of this thread is to say what should XEP actually >>> describe, right? ;) Can you please comment my example? I'd like to >>> know what you think. >> >> I *think* we have consensus, but I'm still pondering it. I will update >> the spec accordingly to make sure that I understand it. > > Before I get too far in the spec updates, here is an example. > > Client thinks version is 299. Server thinks it is 309. To simplify, > consider every odd version number to be significant (the server will be > pushing 301, 303, 305, 307, 309). So: > > C: IQ-get [299] > S: IQ-result > S: push [301] > S: push [303] > S: push [305] > </stream:stream> > C: IQ-get [305] > S: push [307] > S: push [309] > > Yes? >
That's right.
