On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Richard Dobson<[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes, similar, except I'd like to hang extra elements off it, instead >> of extra attributes. > Surely you can just namespace an element then instead of just an attribute > to accomplish that? As far as I can see whether its an attribute or an > element is just semantics, as long as its appropriately namespace'd it > doesn't really affect the core protocol.
Yes, exactly right - it just needs a namespace - which was why I started the thread saying something like "While we're changing the namespace, can we slip this in?" :) /K
