On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Evgeniy Khramtsov <[email protected]>wrote:
> New feature wouldn't be supported at all, as practice shown: there were XEP > about sessions handoffs, now, who can recall it's number? Doing it in BOSH would also be a new feature. Scaling XMPP seems straightforward: load-balance the XMPP/BOSH front ends >> via DNS or any >> other mechanism, and handle message routing behind the scenes. Exposing >> that to the front-ends seems unnecessary, and just introduces ways for >> things to go wrong.) >> > > Such scaling is not a way to go: balancing doesn't help you to much until > you have too many *shared* data across a cluster. A good approach is taken > by SIP folks: they put some pieces of state in packets using record-routing > technics and this works very good. I disagree, but I don't have time right now to get into a long discussion about it. If anyone else wants to, feel free... -- Glenn Maynard
