On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Evgeniy Khramtsov <[email protected]>wrote:

> 10.05.2011 17:21, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>
>> Doing it in BOSH would also be a new feature.
>>
>
> It is pretty possible to make this feature backward compatible: if you
> don't see Cookie in a packet, you route that packet internally.


Nothing stops you from using it if the client supports it; the spec doesn't
prohibit other headers from being set.  I'm just opposed to BOSH *requiring*
cookie support from clients.

-- 
Glenn Maynard

Reply via email to