10.05.2011 17:21, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Evgeniy Khramtsov<[email protected]>wrote:
New feature wouldn't be supported at all, as practice shown: there were XEP
about sessions handoffs, now, who can recall it's number?
Doing it in BOSH would also be a new feature.
It is pretty possible to make this feature backward compatible: if you
don't see Cookie in a packet, you route that packet internally.
Such scaling is not a way to go: balancing doesn't help you to much until
you have too many *shared* data across a cluster. A good approach is taken
by SIP folks: they put some pieces of state in packets using record-routing
technics and this works very good.
I disagree, but I don't have time right now to get into a long discussion
about it. If anyone else wants to, feel free...
Of course, there are always someone who agrees and disagrees: it's a
matter of choice and we need to provide it. If you don't need it you
don't use it, that's simple.
--
Regards,
Evgeniy Khramtsov, ProcessOne.
xmpp:[email protected].
