11.05.2011 06:17, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Evgeniy Khramtsov<[email protected]>wrote:
It is pretty possible to make this feature backward compatible: if you
don't see Cookie in a packet, you route that packet internally.
Nothing stops you from using it if the client supports it; the spec doesn't
prohibit other headers from being set. I'm just opposed to BOSH *requiring*
cookie support from clients.
I don't understand your position: "I don't want it, so noone should want
it". That's not how standards are written.
If we can't require it, then we should RECOMMEND it.
--
Regards,
Evgeniy Khramtsov, ProcessOne.
xmpp:[email protected].
