On 8/11/11 2:28 PM, Michael Laukner wrote: > Thanks for developing this XEP and trying to reduce handshakes. We > are looking into using XMPP over radios (2400 .... 9600 bps)
Yes, that's one of the use cases for this work. > and were > looking into using something similar to HTTP pre-binding > (http://metajack.im/2009/12/14/fastest-xmpp-sessions-with-http-prebinding/) > . Number of handshakes is currently one of the main argument against > XMPP (when comparing XMPP and IRC). We have had best results with the > old (legacy and less secure) Jabber NON-SASL standard > (http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0078.html). Sure, we added some round trips when we added security features during formalization of the old Jabber protocols as XMPP. Tradeoffs. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
