On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > Although this needs some thought to handle XHTML-IM, and it may prove > impossible - though we've done worse things with FLOTs before.
Been away, so replying late, too. >From first glance, XEP-0308 doesn't seem incompatible with XHTML-IM. It seems to be "naturally" usable with stanzas containing XHTML-IM -- just send a standard XHTML-IM message (with both <body/> and <html/>) but also include a <replace/> in stanza. Problem solved. The exact same reasonable UI suggestion can be followed as well. Can you explain the situation of impossibility? I am interested in your POV. Thanks, Mark Rejhon
