On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Gunnar Hellstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-08-31 14:27, Kurt Zeilenga wrote: >> On Aug 31, 2012, at 4:09 AM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm still concerned that replacing any but the author's last message is >>> likely to cause problems with accurately presenting the data. >> >> I generally think it best to separately display the corrected text (as a >> new message) in the presentation stream with annotations that it is a >> replacement for a previously presented text, whether it's the last message >> or not. This not only for security reasons, but to maintain conversational >> flow. >> >> -- Kurt > > It has been silent around XEP-0308 some time now. > XEP-0301 In-Band Real-time text is about to be published in a new version. > It refers to XEP-0308 for editing earlier messages. > I have not yet seen a conclusion on the issue in XEP-0308, if it will enable > correction of only the last message or any previous. > > The decision influences language in XEP-0301, so I would appreciate to know > the decision.
Actually, the way I worded was to make it subject to interpretation of XEP-0308 You will see I still refer to just the last message, but that it can be reinterpreted to mean any message. I don't think it necessarily prevents any implementer to choose to support just last message editing, or editing further back retroactively. I'll re-review the wording, as I want it to be XEP-0308 that decides how far back to edit.
