On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Gunnar Hellström < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-10-13 04:24, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> I know that Kev has been quite busy, but he's quire reliable and I'm >> sure he will incorporate the Last Call feedback as he has promised to do. >> > Was there any last call conclusion? > The feedback was so varied, > some saying that the feature was essential, some saying that it should not > be allowed, > some requiring that the edited message shall be shown last with > changemarks, some accepting the change made in place. > Edit any versus strictly edit last was also discussed. > > My conclusions are: > 1. The feature will be allowed. ( deduced from your answer that Kev is > asked do do an update ) > 2. How edits are presented to the receiving user is out of scope, but a > recommendation to make it clearly displayed that there was an edit will be > included. > 3. Edit any previous will be included. It is up to the transmitter to use > it or not. Receivers should be prepared to act on editing any previous. > This is my preference as well, though I seemed to recall that Kevin was going to keep it as is, for editing just the last message. Regardless, the XEP-0301 protocol will be compatible with either method. As for my XEP-0301 updates, keep tuned. Workload and certain priorities has increased as of late, but I will be catching up. I know that the U.S. access board has inquired asking about when it'll be ready. Thanks, Mark Rejhon
